江西快三开奖记录 www.2yuh3.cn 作者:admin


2017-8-24 16:55


Having spent the better part of my life in Europe and the last 10 years in China I’ve actually tilted in favor of the Chinese system. Why? Because in China the government is better at meeting people’s needs in terms of improving their quality of life. True corruption has been rampant even though to a lesser extent today but politicians all over the world do their best to cling on to power and keep whatever superior benefits they may have so in that case the difference is not that great from a philosophical standpoint.

The problem with so called “Western democracy“ is that it only gives politicians very short-term incentives to stay in power and winning the next election with little attention to what should be done in between also buying votes with money and through lies (they say something before election and then they deliver something totally different post-election). Also forming coalitions with minority parties that get a disproportionate amount power to carry out crazy policies. Not to mention the extremely slow decision making process and political pie throwing causing stalemates.

And most important of all tell me what’s the long-term vision of a country like say Belgium or Denmark? Right. No one knows. In China there’s always a main headline like “inclusive growth“ “Made in China 2025“ and so on and so forth that unites and sets the direction as a whole. US is starting to come to grips with this with “Make America Great“ again EU has no clue where it’s going.

To sum up: Democracy for me means serving the people and considering the economic growth and increased political power of China there’s little doubt who has the superior governance system. Those that do not see this will wake up one day and ask themselves “how could this happen“?

After Arab spring and Iraq occupation how can still have people believe America is spending huge amount military resources and NGO funding altruistically for the democracy of China? Did any candidate for president campaign ever ask voters to spend tax dollars for Chinese democracy?

Chines is fighting for democracy by resisting Western interfering. Because China is a better democratic country then western powers Chinese industrialization takes short time without resort to colonization slave trade opium trade and gunboat diplomacy.

One of the characters distinguish Chinese democracy from Western democracy is the multiple parties scheme. Western democracy is based on competition among parties while Chinese democracy is based on coalition of all parties.

There are many parties in China. Every parties in China is constantly evolved in government policy making thought National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). The representatives come from all democratic parties and individuals without affiliation to any party.

There were two strong parties during Anti-Fascist-Japanese-Invasion-War: KMT and CCP. When Anti-Japanese War was in the end game Mao published his article ON COALITION GOVERNMENT, detailed the policy of building a unified China of Independence Freedom Democracy and Prosperity. Majority of parties in China supported CCP’s idea of coalition government except KMT. KMT wanted to exclude all other parties and had KMT the only party to rule China. Chiang assassinated a few democratic activists in the era of White Terror. After Japan surrendered on 1945 KMT launched civil war and was defeated.

New China was established on 1949 with political system structured largely according to the document of ON COALITION GOVERNMENT.

Chinese democracy is therefore different from Western democracy. Western democracy is based on competition among multiple parties while Chinese democracy is based on coalition among multiple parties. A coalition need a leader and all parties supported CCP as the leader due to the leadership CCP played in Anti-Japanese War. CCP leadership is therefore written into the Constitution. A Anti-Japanese invasion song become the national anthem. The constitution was the result of political consultation by many parties together. Chinese political parties were therefore not compete with each other for power but cooperated together focusing on how to build a new China. Each Chinese parties are worried not about the interest of special groups but emphasize on how to build a new China they wanted for a hundred years.

For hundred years the fundamental conflict that hindered China from modernizing had not been conflict among different groups of Chinese people but between Chinese people and western powers. It is the international pressure shaped the structure of Chinese political system. That’s the most effective political system to resist outside threat to China. When outside threat is diminished the system will obsolete. Before 2008 China already show signs of evolving toward western political system. Then there come US re-balance of Asia-Pacific and suddenly the system since 1949 reinforced.

Competing among Chinese makes no sense when they facing common enemy such as Japanese invasion. Competing politics makes no sense when China is surrounded by world military forces and nuclear countries. Coalition politics is therefore a historical choice and a unavoidable reality.

  • QS世界大学排名发布:中国11所大学进百强,清华排名创历史 2019-04-21
  • 直击日本死刑的全貌,给罪犯最后的关怀 ——凤凰网房产 2019-04-21
  • 你遇到了吗用户吐槽升iOS 11.4后耗电过快用户吐槽升iOS11后耗电过快-行情资讯 2019-04-20
  • 露营玩漂流 重庆周边度假地推荐 2019-04-19
  • 通州北三县交通一体化 置业北京最佳选择 ——凤凰网房产北京 2019-04-13
  • 你才是“蠢货”!土地是自然存在的地球的一部分,并不是人类劳动成果,哪来价值?土地不是劳动成果,没有价值,正如空气和阳光不是劳动成果,没有价值一样。懂吗... 2019-04-13
  • 37家掌舵人空缺 险企治理成难题 2019-04-13
  • 《温暖的弦》大结局 张钧甯演技时尚感双双在线 2019-04-13
  • 宝沃推全新纯电动SUV最高时速150km 2019-04-12
  • 《习近平新闻思想讲义(2018年版)》出版发行 2019-04-03
  • 子曰:“朽木不可雕也,粪土之墙不可圬也!于予与何诛?”[哈哈] 2019-04-03
  • 新绛学府城幼儿园举办亲子环保时装秀 2019-03-30
  • 回复@艾鸣1:你还知道丢人? 2019-03-30
  • 新车图解:e5 450 续航提升至480公里 2019-03-29
  • 【端午节民俗地图】浙江遂昌:20.18米!长粽寄长情 2019-03-28
  • 113| 753| 497| 369| 717| 394| 350| 383| 422| 741|